May 23, 2005: letter to Mr. Walter reopen911.org

From Talk2000.NL

Jump to: navigation, search

[edit] Letter to: reopen911.org

c/o Mr. Jimmy Walter

Arnhem, the Netherlands, May 23, 2005

Dear Sir,

I was present at your presentation Friday last (May 20) in Amsterdam (the Netherlands). First, let me say that I admire you and your team for the courage and strength that you exhibit by making this tour and spreading this groundshaking news, that 911 was an inside job.

I am, however, concerned that you might be a victim of a psyops operation (sometimes called gray propaganda) by the very people you try to expose.

It is my conjecture that the Bush 'junta', being exposed by the 911 truth movement in the past 3-4 years, is now at risk of facing prosecution. To avoid this, they need to discredit the evidence against them. In my opinion, the most damning evidence are the facts that the military reponse was very slow. This is not credible in the World's number one military power, which is also known to be slightly paranoid and equipped to fend off a nucleair submarine based missile attack. This is a sore thumb sticking out.

It would be wise for the 'junta' to now try and accuse themselves of being complicit in the attacks! And to "prove" this with hard scientific data - which would subsequently turn out to be completely wrong. Subsequently, when the investigation is reopened and the scientific evidence examined with scrutiny, the 'junta' will be able to convincingly disprove all such theories, because they control the data. They controlled the misinformation, they released the video frames and photo's, they will controll the disproving.

Then your case will be lost for good, as was JFK.

By taking a stance on the physical evidence debate, reopen911.org could easily discredit itself and all the rest of the 911 movement.

In my opinion, it would be wise to raise questions about the physical evidence but emphasize that there are open unanswered questions. Not that this is "proof" that the 'junta' did it.

Furthermore, I think the emphasis should be on the negligence and inexplainable delays. This they cannot deny nor explain away. This is your trumph card. (Unfortunately, you did not go into this at all!)

Please reconsider your approach in the speeches you deliver and on your website. The future of the USA and indeed the world will depend on the choices you make now.

I would greatly appreciate a swift reponse to this.

kind regards, Michael (Mick) Cooper

 


- N a v i g a t i e -

Personal tools